The aim of the procurement is to enter into a framework agreement with one tenderer who shall ensure safe, stable and environmentally friendly bus transport by users in Drammen municipality at a predictable and sober price. The transport shall always be traffic safe and conscious for the user group, and it shall be assumed that school pupils shall have a seat and be properly secured in accordance with the current regulations. The users are mainly pupils with accompanying employees. The transport shall cover the planned bus transport to and from camp schools for pupils in Drammen municipality. The attached plans for driving are based on the current known need and shall be seen as illustrative for typical assignments and route set up in the framework agreement period. The actual call-off and final schedule may vary from year to year depending on the schools ́needs, activity plans and pupil numbers. Changes to schedules within the framework agreement ́s theme and value do not constitute a significant change to the framework agreement.
Frist
Fristen for mottak av tilbud var 2026-04-09.
Anskaffelsen ble publisert 2026-03-05.
Kunngjøring av konkurranse (2026-03-05) Gjenstand Anskaffelsens omfang
Tittel: Open tender contest for a framework agreement for bus transport for school camps for Drammen municipality
Referansenummer: 4276
Kort beskrivelse:
The aim of the procurement is to enter into a framework agreement with one tenderer who shall ensure safe, stable and environmentally friendly bus transport by users in Drammen municipality at a predictable and sober price. The transport shall always be traffic safe and conscious for the user group, and it shall be assumed that school pupils shall have a seat and be properly secured in accordance with the current regulations. The users are mainly pupils with accompanying employees.
The transport shall cover the planned bus transport to and from camp schools for pupils in Drammen municipality.
The attached plans for driving are based on the current known need and shall be seen as illustrative for typical assignments and route set up in the framework agreement period.
The actual call-off and final schedule may vary from year to year depending on the schools ́needs, activity plans and pupil numbers. Changes to schedules within the framework agreement ́s theme and value do not constitute a significant change to the framework agreement.
The aim of the procurement is to enter into a framework agreement with one tenderer who shall ensure safe, stable and environmentally friendly bus transport by users in Drammen municipality at a predictable and sober price. The transport shall always be traffic safe and conscious for the user group, and it shall be assumed that school pupils shall have a seat and be properly secured in accordance with the current regulations. The users are mainly pupils with accompanying employees.
The transport shall cover the planned bus transport to and from camp schools for pupils in Drammen municipality.
The attached plans for driving are based on the current known need and shall be seen as illustrative for typical assignments and route set up in the framework agreement period.
The actual call-off and final schedule may vary from year to year depending on the schools ́needs, activity plans and pupil numbers. Changes to schedules within the framework agreement ́s theme and value do not constitute a significant change to the framework agreement.
Kontrakttype: Tjenester
Produkter/tjenester: Utleie av busser og turistbusser med sjåfør📦
Estimert verdi eksklusive mva: 2 000 000 NOK 💰
Beskrivelse
Intern identifikator: 5586
Tilleggsprodukter/-tjenester:
Land: Norge 🇳🇴
Utførelsessted: Buskerud
🏙️
Varighet: 1461 dager Tildelingskriterier
Pris ✅
Pris (vekting): 100
Kvalitetskriterium (navn): The contracting authority has concluded that the exemption regulation can be used for school camps and that is "clear" that the climate and environmental requirements in the requirement specifications will have a better climate and environmental effect than an evaluation with 30% weighting. The contracting authority has therefore chosen to replace the award criteria with a minimum requirement for Euro 6 standard in combination with a best-effort commitment for actual use of zero emissions where practically possible. The following is a statement of the selection:
Parent
The contracting authority has a clear need to reduce the climate footprint from bus transport, also at school camps. For this type of service procurement, environment is a central part of the objective of the procurement. At the same time, the market dialogue shows that school camp transport has distinctive practical and technical limitations that differ considerably from regular daily driving.
Main findings from the market dialogue.
The market dialogue shows that an absolute zero emission requirement for school camp driving is not feasible. This is due to several technical and practical conditions:
Baggage capacity and weight: Electric buses have a significantly higher self-weight than diesel buses due to battery packs. Baggage is at risk of having to leave luggage due to weight problems.
Range and charging infrastructure: School camp driving often involves longer distances than regular daily driving. The buses currently on the market can drive 500-600 km without charging in summer, but the range is affected by weather conditions, topography and load. Access to charging infrastructure at destination locations is uncertain.
Market access: There are few relevant suppliers who have electric buses with sufficient capacity ready at the start of the contract.
Why Euro 6 as a minimum requirement is more appropriate than zero emission requirement or award criteria
With a minimum requirement of zero emissions for school camps, most qualified providers would be excluded from the competition. Such a requirement cannot be consistent, given that the baggage need, passenger numbers and range vary between assignment and are not known at the time of the tender or contract. A zero emission requirement would therefore be contrary to the proportionality principle and the principle of competition in the Procurement Act § 4, and would not be "suitable" in relation to the nature of the delivery.
It is very difficult for both tenderers and the Contracting Authority to evaluate in advance what proportion of zero emissions can actually be committed to deliver, given the variability of the school camp assignments. An award criteria based on the estimated share of zero emission driving would complicate both the evaluation and later follow-up, as tenderers cannot guarantee a fixed percentage given the variability of the assignments.
By setting Euro 6 as the absolute minimum requirement, all tenders are ensured that they fulfil a high environmental standard that can be met in a consistent manner. At the same time, a contractual obligation ensures the actual use of zero emissions "where practically possible" that tenderers commit to maximising the share of zero emissions within the practical frameworks. This is a more accurate tool than a relative point scale that does not take into account the practical limitations.
A minimum requirement of Euro 6 combined with best-effort gives, therefore, more verifiable and enforceable environmental obligations in the contract period.
The market dialogue shows that most suppliers can deliver Euro 6 standards and that some can also deliver zero emissions for some camp school trips. By choosing a minimum requirement for Euro 6, high environmental ambitions can therefore be combined with real competition and feasibility for the supplier market.
Summarised
Evaluation with 30% weighting on the estimated share of zero emission driving risks a winner of tenders with optimistic estimates, but that the actual environmental performance will be lower than expected due to practical limitations. An absolute zero emission requirement would exclude qualified tenderers and be contrary to the proportionality principle.
It is therefore clear that a minimum requirement of Euro 6 standard combined with a best-commitment commitment to the actual use of zero emissions gives a better climate and environmental effect than evaluation with 30 % weighting.
Kvalitetskriterium (vekting): 0
Tittel
Identifikasjonsnummer for delkontrakt: LOT-0001
Prosedyre Prosedyretype
Åpen anbudskonkurranse ✅
Rettslig grunnlag: Direktiv 2014/24/EU
Administrativ informasjon
Frist for mottak av tilbud eller forespørsler om deltakelse: 2026-04-09 10:00:00.000 📅
Språk som tilbud eller forespørsler om deltakelse kan sendes inn på: engelsk 🗣️
norsk 🗣️
Minste tidsramme som tilbyderen må opprettholde tilbudet i: 3 måneder Informasjon om en rammeavtale eller en dynamisk innkjøpsordning
Rammeavtale med flere leverandører ✅
Maksimalt antall deltakere: 1
Anbudsvilkår
Elektronisk fakturering: Påkrevd
Elektronisk bestilling vil bli brukt ✅
Elektronisk betaling vil bli brukt ✅ Tildelingskriterier
Vekttype: Vekting (prosent, eksakt)
Anbudsvilkår
Kontrakten har gjennomføringsvilkår ✅
Juridisk, økonomisk, finansiell og teknisk informasjon Vilkår for deltakelse
Utvalgskriterium: Innmelding i handelsregister
Liste og kort beskrivelse av regler og kriterier:
The tenderer ́s registration, authorisations, etc.: Tenderers shall be registered in a company register, professional register or registered in a commerce register in the country where the tenderer is established.
Documentation requirements:
• Norwegian companies: Company Registration Certificate.
• Foreign companies: Verification that the tenderer is registered in a company register, professional register or a commerce register in the country where the tenderer is established.
The tenderer ́s registration, authorisations, etc.: Tenderers shall be registered in a company register, professional register or registered in a commerce register in the country where the tenderer is established.
Documentation requirements:
• Norwegian companies: Company Registration Certificate.
• Foreign companies: Verification that the tenderer is registered in a company register, professional register or a commerce register in the country where the tenderer is established.
Utvalgskriterium: Andre økonomiske eller finansielle krav
Liste og kort beskrivelse av regler og kriterier:
The tenderer's economic and financial capacity: Tenderers must have sufficient economic and financial capacity to be able to fulfil the contract. Creditworthiness with no requirement for collateral will be sufficient to meet the requirement
Documentation requirements:
Credit rating based on the most recent financial figures. The rating shall be carried out by a credit rating company with licence to conduct this service.
The tenderer's economic and financial capacity: Tenderers must have sufficient economic and financial capacity to be able to fulfil the contract. Creditworthiness with no requirement for collateral will be sufficient to meet the requirement
Documentation requirements:
Credit rating based on the most recent financial figures. The rating shall be carried out by a credit rating company with licence to conduct this service.
Hovedfinansieringsvilkår og betalingsordninger og/eller henvisning til relevante bestemmelser som regulerer dem: N/A
Vilkår knyttet til kontrakten
Vilkår for kontraktoppfyllelse: N/A
Vilkår for deltakelse
Utestengelsesgrunn:
Akkord med kreditorer
Avtaler med andre økonomiske aktører som har til formål å vri konkurransen
Barnearbeid og andre former for menneskehandel
+ 23 til
Bedrageri
Brudd på forpliktelser fastsatt i nasjonale utelukkelsesgrunner
Brudd på forpliktelser på arbeidsrettens område
Brudd på forpliktelser på miljørettens område
Brudd på forpliktelser på sosialrettens område
Brudd på plikt til å betale skatter
Brudd på plikt til å betale trygdeavgifter
Brudd på yrkesetiske regler innen forsvarsanskaffelser
Deltakelse i en kriminell organisasjon
Direkte eller indirekte deltakelse i forberedelsen av denne anskaffelsen
Eiendeler under administrasjon av bobestyrer
Forretningsvirksomheten er suspendert
Grov yrkesfeil
Hvitvasking eller terrorfinansiering
Insolvens
Interessekonflikt på grunn av deltakelse i anskaffelsesprosedyren
Konkurs
Korrupsjon
Manglende pålitelighet som utgjør risiko for nasjonal sikkerhet
Terrorhandlinger eller handlinger knyttet til terrorvirksomhet
Tidlig oppsigelse, erstatning eller andre tilsvarende sanksjoner
Tilsvarende situasjon som konkurs, insolvens eller akkord etter nasjonal rett
Uriktige opplysninger, tilbakeholdt informasjon, manglende evne til å fremlegge nødvendige dokumenter, eller å ha skaffet seg fortrolige opplysninger om denne anskaffelsesprosedyren
Beskrivelse av utelukkelsesgrunner:
Is the tenderer in a bankruptcy situation? Specify why, under the mentioned circumstances, one is able to carry out the contract, considering the current national provisions and measures for continuing the business activities? It is not necessary to provide this information if rejection of tenderers in such a situation is obligatory in accordance with the current national law with no exceptions, when the tenderer is still able to carry out the contract.
Is the tenderer in a bankruptcy situation? Specify why, under the mentioned circumstances, one is able to carry out the contract, considering the current national provisions and measures for continuing the business activities? It is not necessary to provide this information if rejection of tenderers in such a situation is obligatory in accordance with the current national law with no exceptions, when the tenderer is still able to carry out the contract.
Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, in the event a enforceable verdict has been convicted of corruption by a verdict handed down not more than five years ago, or a rejection period determined directly in the judgement that still applies? Corruption as defined in Article 3 of the Convention on Combating Corruption, Involving European Communities or European Union Member States (EUT C 195 of 25.6.1997, s. 1), and in Article 2, point 1, in the Council ́s framework decision 2003/568/RIA of 22 July 2003 on combating corruption in the private sector (EUT L 192 of 31.7.2003, p. 54). This rejection reason also includes corruption as defined in national law for the contracting authority or supplier.
Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, in the event a enforceable verdict has been convicted of corruption by a verdict handed down not more than five years ago, or a rejection period determined directly in the judgement that still applies? Corruption as defined in Article 3 of the Convention on Combating Corruption, Involving European Communities or European Union Member States (EUT C 195 of 25.6.1997, s. 1), and in Article 2, point 1, in the Council ́s framework decision 2003/568/RIA of 22 July 2003 on combating corruption in the private sector (EUT L 192 of 31.7.2003, p. 54). This rejection reason also includes corruption as defined in national law for the contracting authority or supplier.
Is the supplier in a situation where he has been forced debt arrangement? Specify why, under the mentioned circumstances, one is able to carry out the contract, considering the current national provisions and measures for continuing the business activities? It is not necessary to provide this information if rejection of tenderers in such a situation is obligatory in accordance with the current national law with no exceptions, when the tenderer is still able to carry out the contract.
Is the supplier in a situation where he has been forced debt arrangement? Specify why, under the mentioned circumstances, one is able to carry out the contract, considering the current national provisions and measures for continuing the business activities? It is not necessary to provide this information if rejection of tenderers in such a situation is obligatory in accordance with the current national law with no exceptions, when the tenderer is still able to carry out the contract.
Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, at the time a legally convicted verdict of participation in a criminal organisation by a verdict handed down no more than five years ago, or a rejection period set out directly in the judgement that still applies? Participation in a criminal organisation as defined in Article 2 of the Council ́s framework decision 2008/841/RIA of 24 October 2008 on combating organised crime (EUT L 300 of 11.11.2008, p. 42).
Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, at the time a legally convicted verdict of participation in a criminal organisation by a verdict handed down no more than five years ago, or a rejection period set out directly in the judgement that still applies? Participation in a criminal organisation as defined in Article 2 of the Council ́s framework decision 2008/841/RIA of 24 October 2008 on combating organised crime (EUT L 300 of 11.11.2008, p. 42).
Has the tenderer entered into agreement(s) with other tenderers with the intention of turning the competition?
Is the tenderer aware of breaches of environmental provisions as stated in national law, the relevant notice or procurement documents or Article 18 (2) of Directive 2014/24/EU.
Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies,…
… in the event a legal verdict has been convicted of money laundering or financing terrorism by a verdict handed down no more than five years ago, or a rejection period set out directly in the judgement that still applies? Money laundering or financing terrorism As defined in Article 1 of the European Parliament and Council Directive 2005/60/EF of 26 October 2005 on preventive measures against the use of the financial system for money laundering and financing terrorism (EUT L 309 of 25.11.2005, p. 15).
… at the time a legally convicted of fraud has been convicted of fraud by a verdict handed down not more than five years ago, or a rejection period determined directly in the judgement that still applies? Fraud included in Article 1 of the Convention on protection of the Financial Interests of the European Communities (EFT C 316 of 27.11.1995, p. 48).
… in the event a legal verdict has been convicted of child labour and other forms of human trafficking by a verdict handed down no more than five years ago, or a rejection period determined directly in the judgement that still applies? Child labour and other forms of human trafficking as defined in Article 2 of the European Parliament and council directive 2011/36/EU of 5. 1 April 2011 on the prevention and control of human trafficking and the protection of its victims and for compensation of the Council ́s framework decision 2002/629/RIA (EUT L 101 of 15.4.2011, p. 1).
Is the tenderer in an insolvency situation? Specify why, under the mentioned circumstances, one is able to carry out the contract, considering the current national provisions and measures for continuing the business activities? It is not necessary to provide this information if rejection of tenderers in such a situation is obligatory in accordance with the current national law with no exceptions, when the tenderer is still able to carry out the contract.
Is the tenderer in an insolvency situation? Specify why, under the mentioned circumstances, one is able to carry out the contract, considering the current national provisions and measures for continuing the business activities? It is not necessary to provide this information if rejection of tenderers in such a situation is obligatory in accordance with the current national law with no exceptions, when the tenderer is still able to carry out the contract.
Is the tenderer aware of breaches of provisions on working conditions as stated in national law, the relevant notice or procurement documents or Article 18 (2) of Directive 2014/24/EU.
Specify why, under the mentioned circumstances, one is able to carry out the contract, considering the current national provisions and measures for continuing the business activities? It is not necessary to provide this information if rejection of tenderers in such a situation is obligatory in accordance with the current national law with no exceptions, when the tenderer is still able to carry out the contract.
Specify why, under the mentioned circumstances, one is able to carry out the contract, considering the current national provisions and measures for continuing the business activities? It is not necessary to provide this information if rejection of tenderers in such a situation is obligatory in accordance with the current national law with no exceptions, when the tenderer is still able to carry out the contract.
Has the tenderer: a) given grossly incorrect information with the notification of the information required to verify that there is no basis for rejection, or of the qualification requirements being fulfilled, b) failed to provide such information, c) made reservations immediately to present the supporting documents requested by the contracting authority, or d) improperly affected the contracting authority ́s decision process to acquire confidential information that could give this an unlawful advantage in connection with competition, or negligently has given misleading information that can have a significant influence on decisions on rejection, selection or award?
Has the tenderer: a) given grossly incorrect information with the notification of the information required to verify that there is no basis for rejection, or of the qualification requirements being fulfilled, b) failed to provide such information, c) made reservations immediately to present the supporting documents requested by the contracting authority, or d) improperly affected the contracting authority ́s decision process to acquire confidential information that could give this an unlawful advantage in connection with competition, or negligently has given misleading information that can have a significant influence on decisions on rejection, selection or award?
Is the tenderer aware of a conflict of interest as stated in national law, the relevant notice or procurement documents?
Has the tenderer or an entity associated with the supplier advised the contracting authority or in another way been involved in the planning of the competition?
Has the tenderer committed serious errors in professional practice? If relevant, see the definitions in national law, the relevant notice or procurement documents.
Has the tenderer committed significant breaches of contract in connection with the fulfilment of a previous public contract, a previous contract with a public contracting authority or a previous concession contract, where the breach has led to the cancellation of the contract, compensation or other similar sanctions?
Has the tenderer committed significant breaches of contract in connection with the fulfilment of a previous public contract, a previous contract with a public contracting authority or a previous concession contract, where the breach has led to the cancellation of the contract, compensation or other similar sanctions?
Is the tenderer aware of breaches of provisions on social conditions as stated in national law, the relevant notice or procurement documents or Article 18 (2) of Directive 2014/24/EU.
Have tenderers failed to fulfil all their social security obligations in the country where they are established and in their member state, if this is a different country than what he is established in?
Has the tenderer not fulfilled all of his tax and duty obligations in both the country where he is established and in the contracting authority's member state, if this is a different country than what he is established in?
Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body, or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies,…
… in the event a legal verdict has been convicted of acts of terrorism or criminal acts connected to terrorist activities by a verdict handed down no more than five years ago, or a rejection period set out directly in the judgement that still applies? Acts of terrorism or criminal acts relating to terrorist activity as defined in Article 1 and 3 of the Council ́s framework decision 2002/475/RIA of 13 June 2002 on combating terrorism (EFT L 164, af 22.6.2002, p. 3). This rejection reason also includes incitement to, participation or attempts to commit such actions as included in Article 4 in the mentioned framework decision.
… have been legally convicted of offences regarding professional behaviour in defence procurements?
Is the tenderer assessed to lack reliability that is necessary to exclude the risk of national security?
The contracting authority shall state that in Norway there are national rejection reasons. These shall be described in the procurement documents. Tenderers must respond to whether they are in one or more of the situations described in the national rejection reasons.
The contracting authority shall state that in Norway there are national rejection reasons. These shall be described in the procurement documents. Tenderers must respond to whether they are in one or more of the situations described in the national rejection reasons.
Oppdragsgiver Navn og adresser
Navn: Drammen kommune
Nasjonalt registreringsnummer: 921234554
Postadresse: Engene 1
Postnummer: 3015
Poststed: Drammen
Region: Buskerud
🏙️
Land: Norge 🇳🇴
Kontaktpunkt: Ida Elleflaadt
E-post: kommunepost@drammen.kommune.no📧
Telefon: +47 32040000📞
URL: https://www.drammen.kommune.no/🌏
Adresse til kjøperprofilen: https://www.drammen.kommune.no/🌏 Type oppdragsgiver
Offentligrettslig organ
Hovedaktivitet
Alminnelige offentlige tjenester
Kommunikasjon
Deltakelses-URL: https://app.artifik.no/procurements/4276🌏
Navn: e-Tendering
Tilgang til konkurransegrunnlaget er begrenset
Elektronisk innsending: Påkrevd
Utfyllende informasjon Klageinstans
Navn: Buskerud tingrett
Nasjonalt registreringsnummer: 826726342
Postadresse: Postboks 1066 Bragernes
Postnummer: 3001
Poststed: Drammen
Region: Oslo
🏙️
Land: Norge 🇳🇴
E-post: buskerud.tingrett@domstol.no📧
Telefon: +47 32211600📞
URL: https://www.domstol.no/no/domstoler/tingrett/buskerud-tingrett/🌏 Tjeneste hvor informasjon om klageprosedyren kan innhentes Samme som: Navn og adresser Informasjon om elektroniske arbeidsflyter
Elektronisk fakturering vil bli akseptert
Kilde: OJS 2026/S 047-162351 (2026-03-05)