The contracting authority ́s objective with this procurement is to enter into a contract for renovation of existing public chairs connected to Store Scene, or alternatively to have new public chairs delivered. Systems shall be offered that safeguard the lounge ́s aesthetic, ergonomic and acoustic qualities, with respect for the building's cultural memorial values and practical operational needs. The procurement is divided into four alternative deliveries, with only one of the alternatives being implemented. The reason the procurement is divided into four alternatives is that the builder must be able to handle uncertainty connected to the budget framework and the technical condition of the existing chairs. Alternative deliveries in prioritised order: 1) Alternative 2: Upgraded renovation of existing chairs with improved seating comfort and optimised acoustic adaptation 2) Alternative 1: Renovation of existing chairs 3) Alternative 4: New, upgraded chairs 4) Alternative 3: New chairs The tenderer can choose to submit a tender for one or several of the alternatives. The contracting authority has ambitions to continue and upgrade the current public chairs. As stated in the list, alternative 2 will be the preferred option. The contracting authority ́s evaluation of the alternatives: Tenders for the alternative with the highest priority (alternative 2) will be evaluated first. If the contracting authority receives tenders that fulfil the requirements for alternative 2 that are within the budget limit, the contracting authority will award the contract to one of these tenderers. The evaluation will then be completed and the contracting authority will not evaluate tenders for any of the other alternatives. If the contracting authority does not receive tenders for alternative 2 within the budget limit, the contracting authority will move on to assessing tenders for alternative 1, which has the second highest priority. This will allow the contracting authority to continue down the priority list until there is a tender that fulfils the requirements for the alternative in question within the budget limit. See further information on the project and the need in annex 1.
Frist
Fristen for mottak av tilbud var 2025-05-21.
Anskaffelsen ble publisert 2025-04-15.
Kunngjøring av konkurranse (2025-04-15) Gjenstand Anskaffelsens omfang
Tittel: Public chairs DNS
Referansenummer: 24016
Kort beskrivelse:
The contracting authority ́s objective with this procurement is to enter into a contract for renovation of existing public chairs connected to Store Scene, or alternatively to have new public chairs delivered. Systems shall be offered that safeguard the lounge ́s aesthetic, ergonomic and acoustic qualities, with respect for the building's cultural memorial values and practical operational needs. The procurement is divided into four alternative deliveries, with only one of the alternatives being implemented. The reason the procurement is divided into four alternatives is that the builder must be able to handle uncertainty connected to the budget framework and the technical condition of the existing chairs. Alternative deliveries in prioritised order: 1) Alternative 2: Upgraded renovation of existing chairs with improved seating comfort and optimised acoustic adaptation 2) Alternative 1: Renovation of existing chairs 3) Alternative 4: New, upgraded chairs 4) Alternative 3: New chairs The tenderer can choose to submit a tender for one or several of the alternatives. The contracting authority has ambitions to continue and upgrade the current public chairs. As stated in the list, alternative 2 will be the preferred option. The contracting authority ́s evaluation of the alternatives: Tenders for the alternative with the highest priority (alternative 2) will be evaluated first. If the contracting authority receives tenders that fulfil the requirements for alternative 2 that are within the budget limit, the contracting authority will award the contract to one of these tenderers. The evaluation will then be completed and the contracting authority will not evaluate tenders for any of the other alternatives. If the contracting authority does not receive tenders for alternative 2 within the budget limit, the contracting authority will move on to assessing tenders for alternative 1, which has the second highest priority. This will allow the contracting authority to continue down the priority list until there is a tender that fulfils the requirements for the alternative in question within the budget limit. See further information on the project and the need in annex 1.
The contracting authority ́s objective with this procurement is to enter into a contract for renovation of existing public chairs connected to Store Scene, or alternatively to have new public chairs delivered. Systems shall be offered that safeguard the lounge ́s aesthetic, ergonomic and acoustic qualities, with respect for the building's cultural memorial values and practical operational needs. The procurement is divided into four alternative deliveries, with only one of the alternatives being implemented. The reason the procurement is divided into four alternatives is that the builder must be able to handle uncertainty connected to the budget framework and the technical condition of the existing chairs. Alternative deliveries in prioritised order: 1) Alternative 2: Upgraded renovation of existing chairs with improved seating comfort and optimised acoustic adaptation 2) Alternative 1: Renovation of existing chairs 3) Alternative 4: New, upgraded chairs 4) Alternative 3: New chairs The tenderer can choose to submit a tender for one or several of the alternatives. The contracting authority has ambitions to continue and upgrade the current public chairs. As stated in the list, alternative 2 will be the preferred option. The contracting authority ́s evaluation of the alternatives: Tenders for the alternative with the highest priority (alternative 2) will be evaluated first. If the contracting authority receives tenders that fulfil the requirements for alternative 2 that are within the budget limit, the contracting authority will award the contract to one of these tenderers. The evaluation will then be completed and the contracting authority will not evaluate tenders for any of the other alternatives. If the contracting authority does not receive tenders for alternative 2 within the budget limit, the contracting authority will move on to assessing tenders for alternative 1, which has the second highest priority. This will allow the contracting authority to continue down the priority list until there is a tender that fulfils the requirements for the alternative in question within the budget limit. See further information on the project and the need in annex 1.
Kontrakttype: Bygge- og anleggsarbeid
Produkter/tjenester: Bygge- og anleggsvirksomhet📦 Informasjon om delkontrakter
Denne kontrakten er delt opp i delkontrakter ✅
Tilbud kan leveres for et maksimalt antall delkontrakter: 4
1️⃣
Intern identifikator: 1
Tittel: Alternative 1: Renovation of existing chairs
Beskrivelse av anskaffelsen: Alternative 1 includes renovation of existing chairs
Tilleggsprodukter/-tjenester:
Postadresse: Engen 1
Postnummer: 5011
By: Bergen
Land: Norge 🇳🇴
Utførelsessted: Vestland
🏙️ Varighet
Startdato: 2025-06-02 📅
Sluttdato: 2027-03-31 📅
Informasjon om elektroniske kataloger
Tilbud må presenteres i form av elektroniske kataloger eller inkludere en elektronisk katalog
Tittel
Identifikasjonsnummer for delkontrakt: LOT-0001
2️⃣
Intern identifikator: 2
Tittel: Alternative 2: Upgraded renovation of existing chairs
Beskrivelse av anskaffelsen: Alternative 2 includes upgraded renovation of existing chairs.
Tittel
Identifikasjonsnummer for delkontrakt: LOT-0002
3️⃣
Intern identifikator: 3
Tittel: Alternative 3: New chairs
Beskrivelse av anskaffelsen: Alternative 3 includes the delivery of new chairs.
Tittel
Identifikasjonsnummer for delkontrakt: LOT-0003
4️⃣
Intern identifikator: 4
Tittel: Alternative 4: New chairs, upgraded version
Beskrivelse av anskaffelsen: Alternative 4 includes new chairs in the upgraded version.
Tittel
Identifikasjonsnummer for delkontrakt: LOT-0004
Prosedyre Prosedyretype
Åpen anbudskonkurranse ✅
Rettslig grunnlag: Direktiv 2014/24/EU
Administrativ informasjon
Frist for mottak av tilbud eller forespørsler om deltakelse: 2025-05-21 10:00:00 📅
Vilkår for åpning av tilbud: 2025-05-21 10:00:00 📅
Språk som tilbud eller forespørsler om deltakelse kan sendes inn på: norsk 🗣️ Anbudsvilkår
Åpningsdato: 2025-05-21 10:00:00 📅
Elektronisk katalog: Tillatt
Elektronisk fakturering: Påkrevd
Elektronisk bestilling vil bli brukt ✅
Elektronisk betaling vil bli brukt ✅
Juridisk, økonomisk, finansiell og teknisk informasjon Økonomisk og finansiell stilling
Liste og kort beskrivelse av utvelgelseskriterier:
Economic and financial position requirements: Requirement: Tenderers shall have sufficient economic and financial capacity to be able to fulfil the contract. The required financial capacity will be assessed in relation to the contract ́s value, services, risk and duration. Documentation: Credit assessment from a certified credit rating company based on the most recent accounting figures. The key figures in the accounts must be presented together with an assessment of the tenderer's payment experience.
Economic and financial position requirements: Requirement: Tenderers shall have sufficient economic and financial capacity to be able to fulfil the contract. The required financial capacity will be assessed in relation to the contract ́s value, services, risk and duration. Documentation: Credit assessment from a certified credit rating company based on the most recent accounting figures. The key figures in the accounts must be presented together with an assessment of the tenderer's payment experience.
Vilkår for deltakelse
Liste og kort beskrivelse av regler og kriterier:
Requirement for a quality management system.: Requirement: Tenderers shall have good routines for quality management. Documentation: Documentation shall be given in one of the following ways: Alternative 1: Description of the company's policy for quality management, with emphasis on quality assurance, resource management, manager ́s responsibility and continuous analysis and improvement. Alternative 2: If the tenderer has an ISO 9001 certificate or equivalent, the certificate can be attached as documentation.
Requirement for a quality management system.: Requirement: Tenderers shall have good routines for quality management. Documentation: Documentation shall be given in one of the following ways: Alternative 1: Description of the company's policy for quality management, with emphasis on quality assurance, resource management, manager ́s responsibility and continuous analysis and improvement. Alternative 2: If the tenderer has an ISO 9001 certificate or equivalent, the certificate can be attached as documentation.
Liste og kort beskrivelse av vilkår:
Registration, authorisation, etc. requirements.: Requirement: Tenderers shall be registered in a company register, professional register or a commerce register in the country where the tenderer is established. Documentation: • Norwegian companies: Company Registration Certificate. • Foreign companies: Verification that the tenderer is registered in a company register, professional register or a commerce register in the country where the tenderer is established.
Registration, authorisation, etc. requirements.: Requirement: Tenderers shall be registered in a company register, professional register or a commerce register in the country where the tenderer is established. Documentation: • Norwegian companies: Company Registration Certificate. • Foreign companies: Verification that the tenderer is registered in a company register, professional register or a commerce register in the country where the tenderer is established.
Teknisk og faglig kapasitet
Liste og kort beskrivelse av utvelgelseskriterier:
Requirements regarding technical and professional qualifications.: Requirement: The tenderer shall have good experience with the execution of similar deliveries. Similar deliveries means deliveries of a comparable nature, size and complexity to what the alternatives the tenderer submits a tender for (ref. alternatives 1-4 as described in point 3.2 above and in annex 1). Documentation: Description of the tenderer's most relevant deliveries in the last 5 years. The description must include a statement of the project name, contracting authority, the project ́s total cost and length, the tenderer ́s role in the project, scope in NOK and date of the delivery as well as a description of the delivery. Use the template in part I annex 5 Reference Form. It is the tenderer ́s responsibility to document relevance through the description.
Requirements regarding technical and professional qualifications.: Requirement: The tenderer shall have good experience with the execution of similar deliveries. Similar deliveries means deliveries of a comparable nature, size and complexity to what the alternatives the tenderer submits a tender for (ref. alternatives 1-4 as described in point 3.2 above and in annex 1). Documentation: Description of the tenderer's most relevant deliveries in the last 5 years. The description must include a statement of the project name, contracting authority, the project ́s total cost and length, the tenderer ́s role in the project, scope in NOK and date of the delivery as well as a description of the delivery. Use the template in part I annex 5 Reference Form. It is the tenderer ́s responsibility to document relevance through the description.
Vilkår for deltakelse
Utestengelsesgrunn:
Akkord med kreditorer
Avtaler med andre økonomiske aktører som har til formål å vri konkurransen
Barnearbeid og andre former for menneskehandel
+ 21 til
Bedrageri
Betaling av skatter
Betaling av trygdeavgifter
Brudd på forpliktelser på arbeidsrettens område
Brudd på forpliktelser på miljørettens område
Brudd på forpliktelser på sosialrettens område
Deltakelse i en kriminell organisasjon
Direkte eller indirekte deltakelse i forberedelsen av denne anskaffelsen
Eiendeler under administrasjon av bobestyrer
Forretningsvirksomheten er suspendert
Hvitvasking eller terrorfinansiering
Insolvens
Interessekonflikt på grunn av deltakelse i anskaffelsesprosedyren
Konkurs
Korrupsjon
Rent nasjonale utelukkelsesgrunner
Situasjon tilsvarende konkurs etter nasjonal lovgivning
Skyldig i alvorlige feil i yrkesutøvelsen
Skyldig i uriktig fremstilling, tilbakeholdt informasjon, ute av stand til å fremlegge nødvendige dokumenter og innhentet konfidensiell informasjon om denne prosedyren
Terrorhandlinger eller handlinger knyttet til terrorvirksomhet
Tidlig heving, erstatning eller andre sammenlignbare sanksjoner
Beskrivelse av utelukkelsesgrunner:
Is the supplier in a situation where he has been forced debt arrangement? Specify why, under the mentioned circumstances, one is able to carry out the contract, considering the current national provisions and measures for continuing the business activities? It is not necessary to provide this information if rejection of tenderers made mandatory in accordance with the current national law without the possibility for exceptions.
Is the supplier in a situation where he has been forced debt arrangement? Specify why, under the mentioned circumstances, one is able to carry out the contract, considering the current national provisions and measures for continuing the business activities? It is not necessary to provide this information if rejection of tenderers made mandatory in accordance with the current national law without the possibility for exceptions.
Is the tenderer in a bankruptcy situation? Specify why, under the mentioned circumstances, one is able to carry out the contract, considering the current national provisions and measures for continuing the business activities? It is not necessary to provide this information if rejection of tenderers made mandatory in accordance with the current national law without the possibility for exceptions.
Is the tenderer in a bankruptcy situation? Specify why, under the mentioned circumstances, one is able to carry out the contract, considering the current national provisions and measures for continuing the business activities? It is not necessary to provide this information if rejection of tenderers made mandatory in accordance with the current national law without the possibility for exceptions.
Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies,…
… in the event a enforceable verdict has been convicted of corruption by a verdict handed down not more than five years ago, or a rejection period determined directly in the judgement that still applies? Corruption as defined in Article 3 of the Convention on Combating Corruption, Involving European Communities or European Union Member States (EUT C 195 of 25.6.1997, s. 1), and in Article 2, point 1, in the Council ́s framework decision 2003/568/RIA of 22 July 2003 on combating corruption in the private sector (EUT L 192 of 31.7.2003, p. 54). This rejection reason also includes corruption as defined in national law for the contracting authority or supplier.
… at the time a legally convicted verdict of participation in a criminal organisation by a verdict handed down no more than five years ago, or a rejection period set out directly in the judgement that still applies? Participation in a criminal organisation as defined in Article 2 of the Council ́s framework decision 2008/841/RIA of 24 October 2008 on control of organised crime (EUT L 300 of 11.11.2008, p. 42)
Has the tenderer entered into agreement(s) with other tenderers with the intention of turning the competition?
Is the tenderer aware of breaches of environmental provisions as stated in national law, the relevant notice or procurement documents or Article 18 (2) of Directive 2014/24/EU.
Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies,…
… in the event a legal verdict has been convicted of money laundering or financing terrorism by a verdict handed down no more than five years ago, or a rejection period set out directly in the judgement that still applies? Money laundering or financing terrorism As defined in Article 1 of the European Parliament and Council Directive 2005/60/EF of 26 October 2005 on preventive measures against the use of the financial system for money laundering and financing terrorism (EUT L 309 of 25.11.2005, p. 15).
… at the time a legally convicted of fraud has been convicted of fraud by a verdict handed down not more than five years ago, or a rejection period determined directly in the judgement that still applies? Fraud included in Article 1 of the Convention on protection of the Financial Interests of the European Communities (EFT C 316 of 27.11.1995, p. 48).
… in the event a legal verdict has been convicted of child labour and other forms of human trafficking by a verdict handed down no more than five years ago, or a rejection period determined directly in the judgement that still applies? Child labour and other forms of human trafficking as defined in Article 2 of the European Parliament and council directive 2011/36/EU of 5. 1 April 2011 on the prevention and control of human trafficking and the protection of its victims and for compensation of the Council ́s framework decision 2002/629/RIA (EUT L 101 of 15.4.2011, p. 1).
Is the tenderer in an insolvency situation? Specify why, under the mentioned circumstances, one is able to carry out the contract, considering the current national provisions and measures for continuing the business activities? It is not necessary to provide this information if rejection of tenderers made mandatory in accordance with the current national law without the possibility for exceptions.
Is the tenderer in an insolvency situation? Specify why, under the mentioned circumstances, one is able to carry out the contract, considering the current national provisions and measures for continuing the business activities? It is not necessary to provide this information if rejection of tenderers made mandatory in accordance with the current national law without the possibility for exceptions.
Is the tenderer aware of breaches of provisions on working conditions as stated in national law, the relevant notice or procurement documents or Article 18 (2) of Directive 2014/24/EU.
Specify why, under the mentioned circumstances, one is able to carry out the contract, considering the current national provisions and measures for continuing the business activities? It is not necessary to provide this information if rejection of tenderers made mandatory in accordance with the current national law without the possibility for exceptions.
Specify why, under the mentioned circumstances, one is able to carry out the contract, considering the current national provisions and measures for continuing the business activities? It is not necessary to provide this information if rejection of tenderers made mandatory in accordance with the current national law without the possibility for exceptions.
Have the tenderer:a) given grossly incorrect information when notifying the information required to verify that there is no basis for rejection, or of the qualification requirements being met,b) failed to provide such information,c) subject to immediately submitting the supporting documents requested by the Contracting Authority, ord) improperly affecting the Contracting Authority's decision process to acquire confidential information that could give this an unlawful advantage in connection with competition, or negligently has given misleading information that can have a significant influence on decisions on rejection, selection or award?
Have the tenderer:a) given grossly incorrect information when notifying the information required to verify that there is no basis for rejection, or of the qualification requirements being met,b) failed to provide such information,c) subject to immediately submitting the supporting documents requested by the Contracting Authority, ord) improperly affecting the Contracting Authority's decision process to acquire confidential information that could give this an unlawful advantage in connection with competition, or negligently has given misleading information that can have a significant influence on decisions on rejection, selection or award?
Approved procedures for staffable conditions Has the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, approved a proposal for some of the punishable conditions mentioned above, j.f. the Procurement Regulations § 24-2, (2) section, a-f? Serious errors that cause doubt about his professional integrity Have the tenderer otherwise committed serious errors that cause doubt about his professional integrity, cf.f. the procurement regulations § 24-2, (3) letter in?
Approved procedures for staffable conditions Has the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, approved a proposal for some of the punishable conditions mentioned above, j.f. the Procurement Regulations § 24-2, (2) section, a-f? Serious errors that cause doubt about his professional integrity Have the tenderer otherwise committed serious errors that cause doubt about his professional integrity, cf.f. the procurement regulations § 24-2, (3) letter in?
Are tenderers aware of a conflict of interest as stated in national law, the relevant notice or procurement documents?
Has the tenderer or an entity associated with the supplier advised the contracting authority or in another way been involved in the planning of the competition?
Has the tenderer committed serious errors in professional practice? If relevant, see the definitions in national law, the relevant notice or procurement documents.
Has the tenderer committed significant breaches of contract in connection with the fulfilment of a previous public contract, a previous contract with a public contracting authority or a previous concession contract, where the breach has led to the cancellation of the contract, compensation or other similar sanctions?
Has the tenderer committed significant breaches of contract in connection with the fulfilment of a previous public contract, a previous contract with a public contracting authority or a previous concession contract, where the breach has led to the cancellation of the contract, compensation or other similar sanctions?
Is the tenderer aware of breaches of provisions on social conditions as stated in national law, the relevant notice or procurement documents or Article 18 (2) of Directive 2014/24/EU.
Have tenderers failed to fulfil all their social security obligations in the country where they are established and in their member state, if this is a different country than what he is established in?
Has the tenderer not fulfilled his tax and duty obligations in the country in which he is established, and in the contracting authority's member state, if this is a different country than what he is established in?
Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body, or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, in the event a legal verdict has been convicted of acts of terrorism or criminal acts connected to terrorist activities by a verdict handed down no more than five years ago, or a rejection period set out directly in the judgement that still applies? Acts of terrorism or criminal acts relating to terrorist activity as defined in Article 1 and 3 of the Council ́s framework decision 2002/475/RIA of 13 June 2002 on combating terrorism (EFT L 164, af 22.6.2002, p. 3). This rejection reason also includes incitement to, participation or attempts to commit such actions as included in Article 4 in the mentioned framework decision.
Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body, or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, in the event a legal verdict has been convicted of acts of terrorism or criminal acts connected to terrorist activities by a verdict handed down no more than five years ago, or a rejection period set out directly in the judgement that still applies? Acts of terrorism or criminal acts relating to terrorist activity as defined in Article 1 and 3 of the Council ́s framework decision 2002/475/RIA of 13 June 2002 on combating terrorism (EFT L 164, af 22.6.2002, p. 3). This rejection reason also includes incitement to, participation or attempts to commit such actions as included in Article 4 in the mentioned framework decision.